Posts Tagged ‘Prevention’

Nailing Skin Cancer Awareness

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

We’ve discussed being conscious of sun safety as it applies to things like over-exposure on the arm you rest on the driver’s side window or even through the windshield of your car, exposure in tanning salons, which has been all over the news lately, and even wearing hats on a regular basis. But, per the New York Times article this week, comes a new point of diligence: nail salons.

Picture the polish dryers so prevalent in virtually every salon; don’t they look like little tanning beds for your fingers? Well, there’s a similarity. Apparently, they emit “similar amounts of UV radiation per meter squared, studies show. And like tanning beds, they emit predominantly UVA rays, which penetrate the skin most deeply.”

There are no definitive studies on exact correlation to skin cancer cases, but the advice given is smart: Consider air-drying (indoors.)

Share

To Top it Off…

Monday, June 21st, 2010

It was heartening to see a steady stream of people purchasing hats at one of the street fairs in New York City this weekend. I hope it was an enjoyable Father’s Day weekend for you, and that perhaps many of you bought dad a life-preserving HAT for sun protection in lieu of a tie?

To Top it Off: Sun Safety

To Top it Off: Sun Safety

FYI, at these fairs it’s easy to negotiate for a discount if you buy more than one, so consider a hat for yourself, too!

Another good thing to do for yourself and a loved one is to have regular skin cancer screenings.

What topped off my weekend though was also the opportunity to share this story about digital dermoscopy and MoleSafe’s thorough melanoma screenings, thanks to recent press on AssociatedContent.com.  Please share this info with all your friends and relatives as we enter into the season of “fun in the sun.”

Just don’t forget your hat.

Share

Ooh baby, Sun protection, please!

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

As we mentioned in our May 6th, 2010 post The Environmental Working Group reviews sunscreens for effectiveness, eco and health-friendly levels. Their 2010 ranking was recently released (and featured on NBC newcasts this week). Check for your brand, and possible alternatives that may be better for you, your skin and the planet.

EWG Sun Protection Summary

EWG Sun Protection Summary

The EWG list includes child-safe sunscreens as well, which is sadly a timely topic in the face of a heartbreaking news story last week: a sunbathing British mother apparently enabled her 5-month old to get severe burns over 40% of his body via lack of sun protection. The child was hospitalized with the blistering burn, which were potentially life threatening due to side effects of dehydration and heat-stroke.

How best to protect your children? Well, NONE of us should really be sunbathing at any age, but as stated in this BBC story:

Very young children should be kept in the shade; older children, when out in the sun, should wear protective clothing including a hat, have high factor sun cream regularly applied and drink lots of fluids to stay safe and well.

In this related video from BBC News, it’s interesting to note that most of those interviewed displayed proper protection, including hats and sunglasses. Whether England is more aware of sun dangers or they represented the conscientious minority, we all can take a page from their stylebook and cover up.

Share

Protecting our Planet and our Skin

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

Last month we celebrated the 40th anniversary of Earth Day. And May is Melanoma Awareness month. What do the two have in common? Well, it’s possible to protect your planet while protecting your skin. For our eco-conscious friends (and who isn’t more conscientious these days?) there are resources for natural sunscreens that do a good job with few, if any, chemicals. The Environmental Working Group, a non-profit that prides itself on investigating and exposing the exact ingredients and safety levels of anything from cosmetics to pesticides, offers lists of more naturally based choices.

According to their site, and they quote an excellent story on MSNBC this week that supports the claim:

Surprisingly, 2 of 5 brand-name sunscreens either don’t protect skin from sun damage or contain hazardous chemicals — or both. An Environmental Working Group investigation of 1,804 sunscreens rates the season’s best — and worst.

The ingredients in the product that that topped their list of “Best Sunscreens” meeting their eco and health-friendly criteria, start out with: Zinc Oxide 24.8% Grape Seed Oil, Organic Sunflower Oil, Caprylic/Capric Triglycerides (derived from Coconut Oil). On the “Hazardous” end their list of 1800 brands investigated, the first three active ingredients often include: Octinoxate (7.5%), Octisalate (5%), Oxybenzone.

On the surface that sounds ominous, and in fact Oxybenzone has been called into question frequently, for example. However, it bears a little more reading to make an educated consumer choice – particularly a sidebar to the above story on msnbc.com, which says:

“…To get the best UVA protection, you have to be a real label hawk. Keep an eye out for these ingredients: avobenzone, Mexoryl, and zinc oxide. To be sure that avobenzone has staying power (ironically, the sun quickly renders it ineffective), it should be paired with stabilizers like octocrylene, Polyester-8, butyloctyl salicylate, or ethylhexyl methoxycrylene. (Helioplex, which is available in Neutrogena sunscreens, is a stabilized form of avobenzone.) To guard against free radicals, choose sunscreens that contain antioxidants like vitamins C (aka ascorbic acid) and E (aka tocopherol), which reduce these dangerous molecules by as much as 74%. “

No matter your product choice, it’s important to be diligent about protection, so we don’t want to discourage anyone from practicing safe sun. But since many of the natural products get their UVA/UVB blocking ability from zinc and other occluding minerals that some consumers find more difficult to apply, the EWG also created a list of alternatives that are slightly less natural, but to their team of testers and researchers, still the lesser of some evils. ewg sunscreen guideThose products, also coded on a scale of “recommended” to “avoid”, are listed here.

Now, if you just want to see how your current brand stacks up from a chemical perspective, you can plug in the name on the EWG’s Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Database and make your own choices that way.

Warning, some of these results may be hazardous to your peace of mind. (But remember, moderation is key in most things in life.) I’m not endorsing or condeming any products here, but, as always, just trying to step up your awareness level and your options for caring for your skin. So whether you opt for all natural brands, which may be healthier for the planet, too, or prefer to get your SPF from a leading brand, one thing we DO endorse is the EWG’s responsible listing of sun safety tips.

And, whatever your choice of sunscreen is, please remember to recycle the plastic bottle it came in !

Share

A Lighthearted Look at Dark Tans May Help

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

The tanning bed culture is still, sadly, alive and hard to quell.

A new study released as shared by ABCNews says that "Increased regulation and warnings about the dangers of habitual tanning have not curbed visits to tanning booths, much to the chagrin of doctors and public health advocates,” and may even be "addictive” in some people.

The NY Daily News goes on to explain that "though the research did not definitively prove that tanning is an addiction, some researchers think that, for some people, it can be:

… In the study, 421 students were questioned about their tanning habits. Some 229 of the students used indoor tanning beds. In this group, some 30 to 40 percent met the psychiatric diagnostic criteria for addiction (depending on the scale that was used). The tanners in this group also reported higher use of marijuana, alcohol and other substances, and more anxiety symptoms. Dr. James Spencer, spokesman for the American Academy of Dermatology, told ABC News the study was “an eye opener.” “We think that tanning gives a brief cosmetic change for a lifetime of problems with skin cancer and wrinkles,” he said.

However, there’s good news and bad news from Hollywood on trademark tans.

In another story from NYDailyNews.com, a visual exposé of "Tanorexics” as they were called, shows that many celebs are opting for self-tanners, eschewing the skin-aging, sun-baking version.  ’Tanorexics’

That’s the good news.

The bad news is:

a) they are still fighting to achieve that look at all and

b) some of them are doing it, well, pretty poorly – the worst of them even earning

’Oompa Loompa’ is Not a Good Look for Skin

titles like "Oompa Loompas” or

"radioactive.”

As NYDailyNews.com also says, "tons of stars are sporting some seriously over-the-top tans.”

“Oompa Loompa” is Not a Good Look for Skin

We are heartened that the publication is taking blatant sides, and even heartthrobs are fair game. Captions like this may help move the needle on popularity more to the side of natural pale:

“New York city hotelier Andre Balazs may have been named one of GQ’s Top Ten Most Stylish Men in America, but his summer color is so last season.”

or:

“Las Vegas” actress Molly Sims is one gorgeous girl – but even a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit model can’t pull off the leathery look.”

Let’s hear it for the sunless goddesses like Bebe Neuwirth or Kate Winslet. Bebe Neuwirth

kate winsletFor more inspiration, you can even see Listal’s top 60 "Pale Actresses”!



Share

Love the One You’re With

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

In a recent post, I suggested having winter or summer vacations be your “calendar reminder” of times to do skin self-examinations and book your MoleSafe annual check-ups. But I liked the idea that the Skin Cancer Foundation posted last week for Valentine’s Day: a mutual skin exam. Nothing says I love you more than scrutinizing your partner from scalp to toes!

In all seriousness, Melanoma Updates has also noted back in October that Harvard School of Public Health wanted to encourage more primary care physicians be trained in looking out for melanomas while they happened to be examining other parts of the body. Makes sense to me. So, it makes sense to me that if you’re at all uncomfortable having a full body skin-exam that you could at least start by having your loved one give you a naked eye once-over for spots and dots you can’t see yourself. As the Skin Cancer Foundation’s post points out, “patients themselves detect about half of all melanomas.” They also have a terrific self-exam how-to posted on their site.

As they also note, it doesn’t replace a doctor’s examination, especially one trained in the use of a dermatoscope.

image of dermatoscope

image of dermatoscope

But we are all about moving skin cancer prevention forward, and keeping loved ones around for as long as possible.

Share

Love the One You're With

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

In a recent post, I suggested having winter or summer vacations be your “calendar reminder” of times to do skin self-examinations and book your MoleSafe annual check-ups.  But I liked the idea that the Skin Cancer Foundation posted last week for Valentine’s Day: a mutual skin exam. Nothing says I love you more than scrutinizing your partner from scalp to toes!

In all seriousness, Melanoma Updates has also noted back in October that Harvard School of Public Health wanted to encourage more primary care physicians be trained in looking out for melanomas while they happened to be examining other parts of the body.  Makes sense to me.  So, it makes sense to me that if you’re at all uncomfortable having a full body skin-exam that you could at least start by having your loved one give you a naked eye once-over for spots and dots you can’t see yourself. As the Skin Cancer Foundation’s post points out, “patients themselves detect about half of all melanomas.” They also have a terrific self-exam how-to posted on their site.

As they also note, it doesn’t replace a doctor’s examination, especially one trained in the use of a dermatoscope.

image of dermatoscope

image of dermatoscope

But we are all about moving skin cancer prevention forward, and keeping loved ones around for as long as possible.

Share

Guest Post: A Patient POV

Friday, January 29th, 2010

MoleSafe customer and blogger, E.B. Moss, as our guest blogger, on her experience at MoleSafe in Millburn.

As a "woman of a certain age,” I am used to getting the recommended regular medical tests and checks. But I didn’t know there was more to a skin exam than the occasional inspection done by my dermatologist, when I remembered to even book those check-ups. I was proud of myself for being a little more vigilant than many I know – who had never even done a skin exam let alone been checked between the toes, for example! I felt ahead of the curve by comparison.

Then the experience of two different friends gave me a head’s up about ways to get a better head-to-toe scan. My friend Leslie, who has a lot of "beauty marks,” lives near the Millburn location of MoleSafe and had gotten full body scans and “molemapping” for herself and even her children. (I found out that skin cancers are on the rise among kids – especially teenage girls who have been allowed to use tanning salons.)
(I cringe when I think of us using those sunlamps as kids.)

I was thinking about checking out the place and then I bumped into my friend Carol, who had just gotten back from a follow up exam since her bout with melanoma a few years ago. Her cancer had actually been spotted by a woman standing behind her on a ticket line. Carol had had a sleeveless shirt on, and a woman tapped her on the shoulder and said, "pardon me for intruding, but has anyone ever checked out the mole on the back of your arm?…” Carol was vaguely aware of it, but it wasn’t in a place she could easily see. She decided to see the doctor…and a surgery with 16 stitches inside and 16 stitches outside basically saved her life the next week.

That was enough coincidence to send me to MoleSafe to see for myself…and have someone see ME better than I could myself! I spoke to Dr. Richard Bezozo, who invited me in so I could help share the experience with my readers. Bascially, MoleSafe is a three-prong protocol for screening: "Total Body Photography, total digital dermoscopy and digital sequential monitoring.” Apparently, that’s the gold standard for screenings that most dermatologists in the rest of the world recommend. We’re behind the curve in the good old US of A for being progressive in prevention. And it’s not like this is an invasive protocol.

Anyway, here’s what happens:

First, the place is clean, nice, and comfortable (and right near the train from NY.) You get down to your skivvies (you can keep a paper gown on, but I figured mole mapping is once a year and very important, so might as well go for the semi-full monty.) The exam room has a mat that looks like something from an old-fashioned dance lesson (or these days like a Dance Mat from Wii!)

My very reassuring nurse/"moleographer” had me take a stance with my feet in the position indicated on the mat with hands akimbo (I think that means hands on hip? but I always wanted to be able to use that word in a blog). dance_stepsShe took a set of images that way, then a set of images on the otherside, feet in the opposite position.

Then we sat down at her desk while she uploaded the super high res images, then coordinated the pictures to points on a computer image of a body. It was like creating a constellation on paper. I could immediately understand how the consistency of taking the same position on the mat year after year is a lot more efficient than random poses and "eyeballing” things. My molegrapher then carefully did a visual exam of moles that caught her eye and captured those with a dermatoscope – it’s a super magnifying camera with a special light that really shows details of specific moles. She uploaded those images, also correlated on the computer to the ones she’d marked on the figure.
It was fascinating to see super enlargements of my skin on the computer. You might find out that there are some that are "interesting” – and might be reassured about others…but all of them are sent electronically (yes, safe and encrypted) to a sort of radiologist/dermatologist who reviews the dermatascope images professionally.

You get a lovely CD of your body mole images to take home and give to your dermatologist. Then, a week or two later you have a report from the specialist sent to you.

The thing is, MoleSafe doesn’t do any surgeries or removals, so dermatologists are still involved in the whole process. I guess It’s like sending a person for an MRI and having then having them come back to the doctor to get treated for the broken leg or tumor or whatever. We need to be our own patient advocates and seek out MoleSafe on our own…or bring it to the attention of our doctors. You can go get one without a referral, and some insurance will cover it when you submit the receipt for reimbursement. Some won’t. But it’s an investment in your life compared to the approach most dermatologists have been using for the past 50 years.

So, I recommend you get on board. Or, get on mat, I guess.

PS: The good news is that I am a-okay, but have a much better sense of what to look for, where to look for it, and why.

PSS: MoleSafe is opening at NYU on 2/3. That should be the eye-opener a lot of people need about the value and legitimacy of this kind of protocol.

Share

Melanoma Making News

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

I thought I’d share a compilation this week of some interesting stories that have made the melanoma news alerts recently. Some very exciting developments…for people AND pets!

1. Clamping Down on Tanning Beds:

If you’ve been reading these posts, you know I’ve been mentioning the effort to increase restrictions on tanning beds. This has been championed most strongly in Great Britain and "down under,” but the US is catching up. The FDA will be reviewing guidelines in March.  Here’s a great summary, including the expected response from the Indoor Tanning Association:

Pooches to Pouches

2. Be a best friend to your dog. Keep your ears perked for release of a new therapeutic DNA vaccine designed to aid in extending survival of dogs with oral melanoma. The USDA just licensed Merial Limited for this canine melanoma vaccine.

Since melanoma is one of the most common forms of cancers in dogs, here’s a factual overview of types and symptoms.

3. A clue to a cure from Kangaroos? Aussie scientists are researching how Kangaroos auto-repair their damaged DNA for clues to how we might adapt a therapy down the road for humans.

4. Driving Down Under. A little further south of Australia, the kiwis are getting the news out about prevention while driving. We often take our cues from the southern hemisphere on skin cancer prevention as they have some of the highest rates of the disease in the world, and thus are some of the most proactive in prevention tactics. So I wanted to share this latest suggestion of theirs: a reminder to motorists that they need protection even while inside vehicles, as windows only block 37% of harmful rays.

There are a lot of fashionable driving gloves these days, so why not make a statement!?

Share

Walking in the Shadow of a Giant

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

From December 4-6, 2009, at the 4th Annual Practical Course in Dermoscopy, I walked in the shadow of a giant whose presence will be missed in the teaching process.

This past week Alfred W. Kopf, MD, conducted was what possibly the last lecture from one of the most incredible careers in the specialty of dermatology. And during this conference, which included the latest updates on malignant melanoma, Dr. Kopf’s topic was teaching physicians.

Much as changed since 1985 when Dr. Kopf and his colleagues wrote an article that helped to teach physicians and thus the public the value of skin self-examinations, promoting at that time, the ABCD concept I’ve posted about before. Yet, per my other recent posts, still not enough has changed in getting more physicians trained and on board to be aware and scrutinizing the skin even during other exams.

But Dr. Kopf also spent the next portion of his career promoting the use of total body photography for the early detection of melanoma, and the advocacy of Dermoscopy as an essential tool. He worked diligently to help prove its effectiveness, even helping to identify important mole patterns necessary to make it most effective.

He battled the slow to change tide of US dermatologists, of whom only 23% practice Dermoscopy, vs. its use by virtually 100% of dermatologists outside our country.

To them it’s perceived as essential to their expertise as a stethoscope is to a cardiologist. In the face of the unacceptably low adoption rate in the U.S., Dr Kopf has truly made it his life work to promote the use of Dermoscopy and the training of physicians in that use. I have no doubt his effort has saved thousands of lives.

Dr. Kopf recently retired from NYU Medical School as Professor Emeritus of Dermatology / Clinical Professor, after one of the most notable careers in our field, spanning more than five decades. He also one of the founders of the Skin Cancer Foundation, the Melanoma Newsletter, and has remained an active participant in the melanoma lecture circuit, continuing to provide excellent training to physicians all around the world. I have consulted with and spoken to him on many occasions over the past several years as I have become more involved in the community of physicians working towards effective early diagnosis of melanoma, and he has always been a gentleman, eager to teach, and eager to promote those tools necessary to promote early detection to help save lives.

What make me particularly happy is the knowledge that MoleSafe incorporates almost all of Dr. Kopf’s lifelong passions and topics he’s worked to promote. Now we have to pick up that gauntlet and continue on his path to grow use of Dermoscopy and help improve survival rates exponentially.

Share