From Our Perspective: Maddie Pallamary, RN

Every day, at our four MoleSafe locations, our melanographers see patients with personal stories of what brought them to our offices for their skin exams. Melanoma Updates wants to share the perspective of some of our clinic experts who are at the front lines of patient care, whether graciously guiding our new patients through the process or managing the concerns of those returning. Our first post is from Maddie Pallamary, RN, from our Millburn, NJ location.

Maddy Pallamary, RN, Melanographer - MoleSafe Millburn

Maddie Pallamary, RN, Melanographer - MoleSafe Millburn

Maddie has worked with us from the beginning, and often provides me with insights and recommendations for patient comforts and considerations that have further enhanced their MoleSafe experience.

Here’s her perspective:

I have seen a number of patients, as you can imagine, that have either had a personal melanoma scare or are very high risk and lots of atypical moles.

They tell me of the extreme fear, anxiety, dread and stress they feel every time they visit their dermatologist. This is because they know every time they see their Dermatologist they ALWAYS get cut and have moles excised, sometimes as many as 2 and 3 moles at a time. And to add to the insult, more often than not, the results come back negative/benign. Because of this, some patients don’t always keep their regular MD appointments, which is a bad thing and something potentially deadly could be missed.

After they have had the MoleSafe procedure and understand its benefits, they express to me their utter sense of relief and calm and peace of mind that it will no longer be the case of ‘when in doubt cut it out’ and they will be on the receiving end of no more unnecessary cuts and ugly scaring. Finally, there is an alternative way to manage these high risk patients and monitor their moles over time.

This is why people like me go into nursing: one of its biggest rewards, the sense of fulfillment and to be able to make a difference, to help people and enhance their quality of life.

Thanks, Maddie – and thanks to all our excellent staff who provide considerate and efficient care at all our MoleSafe locations.

Share

Tags: , , ,

  • Mark S.

    Mark Stabinski
    145 Highfield Lane

    732-589-5477 (cell)
    mes4754@aol.com
    April 8th, 2011

    Dear Maddie,

    My name is Mark S. I am soon to be a new MoleSafe patient and have an already scheduled asppointment with you at 9:00 am on Thursday April 21st, 2011.

    I returned the MoleSafe documents that you had mailed to me a little more than a week ago; but also added several important attachments (my personal history and involvement with melanoma risk factors / my personal skin cancer history / and 2 print-outs concerning 2 meaningful issues that I need to make a decision on pursuant to my finalizing a long term 'care plan' with 2 treatment ends in mind: (1) the prevention of new melanomas being generated and (2) the immediate identification and surgical excision of all new
    melanoma lesions not receptive to any type of preventative measures taken while they are still at Stage #0).

    Given that I am presently working outside and in the sun some 8-10 hours a day and 6 days a week: I remain concerned over how I can best protect my scalp against future melanoma developments.

    I am now prescheduled to undergo full body skin cancer/melanoma screenings every 6 weeks for the next 2 years, which will be conducted by my primary dermatologist and my melanoma surgeon on an alternating basis.

    My ongoing research has factually revealed these significant points:

    1. melanoma of the scalp is twice as deadly as melanomas found on any other part of a persons anatomy;
    2. the difference in 'prognosis' from 'good' to 'poor' is usually reached in only a matter of a 'few' months;
    3. melanoma tumors can become metastatic when they are merely 10% of the size of all conventional tumors;
    4. melanoma lesions can assume a variety of forms and colors, making them often difficult to diagnose even when seen;
    5. diagnosis of scalp melanomas is often 'delayed' because the tumor is 'concealed' beneath a person's head hair and in these instances 'not' before they are already present in an advanced stage;
    6. sun screens and sun blocks are usually ineffective in shielding the skin from UVA rays (melanoma catalysts); those somewhat effective when they consist of the elements of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide must be applied and reapplied on an every 2 hour basis; and some recent research studies even suggest that certain sun screens and sun blocks can actually 'cause' melanoma development.

    In light of these research findings, I am seeking your professional recommendation as to which of the following 2 options I should commit to, to best achieve my treatment goals:

    (1) the 'retention' of my currently full head of hair (which 'obscures' my every 6 week physician conducted full body and scalp skin cancer screenings and your mole mapping photo shoot to some degree but affords my scalp, ears and the back of my neck continuous 'natural' protection) or;

    (2) the 'removal' of all head hair that I presently have
    (optimizing my physician screenings, my wife's routine screenings and your own mole mapping photo shoot).

    I would also like my wife to be present with me for our April 21st photo shoot for 'training' purposes in hope that she might learn better 'how' skin cancer screenings should be conducted by watching you work.

    Should 'option #2' become your recommendation, I would need to know this in advance of my appointment to permit me the opportunity to appear for this photo session looking more like Yul Brynner than Paul McCartney.

    Thank you for your time and attention in this matter and I am reachable by either e-mail, cell phone text, or cell phone/house phone.

    Sincerely Yours, MS

    continuous 'natural' protection) or;

    (2) the 'removal' of all present head hair
    (optimizing my physician screenings, my wife's weekly screenings and likewise provides you with a completely

  • Mark S.

    Mark Stabinski
    145 Highfield Lane

    732-589-5477 (cell)
    mes4754@aol.com
    April 8th, 2011

    Dear Maddie,

    My name is Mark S. I am soon to be a new MoleSafe patient and have an already scheduled asppointment with you at 9:00 am on Thursday April 21st, 2011.

    I returned the MoleSafe documents that you had mailed to me a little more than a week ago; but also added several important attachments (my personal history and involvement with melanoma risk factors / my personal skin cancer history / and 2 print-outs concerning 2 meaningful issues that I need to make a decision on pursuant to my finalizing a long term 'care plan' with 2 treatment ends in mind: (1) the prevention of new melanomas being generated and (2) the immediate identification and surgical excision of all new
    melanoma lesions not receptive to any type of preventative measures taken while they are still at Stage #0).

    Given that I am presently working outside and in the sun some 8-10 hours a day and 6 days a week: I remain concerned over how I can best protect my scalp against future melanoma developments.

    I am now prescheduled to undergo full body skin cancer/melanoma screenings every 6 weeks for the next 2 years, which will be conducted by my primary dermatologist and my melanoma surgeon on an alternating basis.

    My ongoing research has factually revealed these significant points:

    1. melanoma of the scalp is twice as deadly as melanomas found on any other part of a persons anatomy;
    2. the difference in 'prognosis' from 'good' to 'poor' is usually reached in only a matter of a 'few' months;
    3. melanoma tumors can become metastatic when they are merely 10% of the size of all conventional tumors;
    4. melanoma lesions can assume a variety of forms and colors, making them often difficult to diagnose even when seen;
    5. diagnosis of scalp melanomas is often 'delayed' because the tumor is 'concealed' beneath a person's head hair and in these instances 'not' before they are already present in an advanced stage;
    6. sun screens and sun blocks are usually ineffective in shielding the skin from UVA rays (melanoma catalysts); those somewhat effective when they consist of the elements of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide must be applied and reapplied on an every 2 hour basis; and some recent research studies even suggest that certain sun screens and sun blocks can actually 'cause' melanoma development.

    In light of these research findings, I am seeking your professional recommendation as to which of the following 2 options I should commit to, to best achieve my treatment goals:

    (1) the 'retention' of my currently full head of hair (which 'obscures' my every 6 week physician conducted full body and scalp skin cancer screenings and your mole mapping photo shoot to some degree but affords my scalp, ears and the back of my neck continuous 'natural' protection) or;

    (2) the 'removal' of all head hair that I presently have
    (optimizing my physician screenings, my wife's routine screenings and your own mole mapping photo shoot).

    I would also like my wife to be present with me for our April 21st photo shoot for 'training' purposes in hope that she might learn better 'how' skin cancer screenings should be conducted by watching you work.

    Should 'option #2' become your recommendation, I would need to know this in advance of my appointment to permit me the opportunity to appear for this photo session looking more like Yul Brynner than Paul McCartney.

    Thank you for your time and attention in this matter and I am reachable by either e-mail, cell phone text, or cell phone/house phone.

    Sincerely Yours, MS

    continuous 'natural' protection) or;

    (2) the 'removal' of all present head hair
    (optimizing my physician screenings, my wife's weekly screenings and likewise provides you with a completely